BRnX Travel

Sign Up > Maximize your true earning potential > Get your rental

$29M Hawaii Tourist Submarine Fraud | Tale Ends In Prison

Hawaii Travel News / August 7, 2025

Origin Article: here

It started with a proposed fleet of sleek, semi-submersible vessels with air-conditioned cabins and panoramic underwater views. That resulted in contracts with Disney, Carnival, and Norwegian Cruise Line. A hundred-million-dollar opportunity, pitched in the heart of Hawaii’s popular ocean tourism industry. It all sounded just close enough to being real.

But none of it was. What started as a glossy fantasy ended in federal court. Nearly $29 million was gone. A Hawaii couple was convicted and sentenced. And the so-called submarine, a surface vessel with underwater viewing windows, never went anywhere near underwater.

A real submarine history in Hawaii.

Underwater tourism isn’t new in Hawaii. Atlantis Submarines began operations here in 1988 and, by 1991, was running battery-powered vessels in Kona, Oahu, and Maui — a business that continues today.

These were real submarines conducting real dives, with a focus on safety, education, and reef conservation. They are Coast Guard certified and operate under their own power, are battery-powered (no fuel discharge), and descend to 100–150 feet below the surface on every tour. Passengers are inside a pressurized, enclosed cabin with large viewports, not in a semi-submersible or glass-bottom boat.

Atlantis has carried more than 18 million people on over half a million dives. Its biggest vessel, the Atlantis XIV, runs off Waikiki, seats 64, and is, by the company’s count, the largest passenger submarine in the world. Atlantis still runs tours on Oahu and the Big Island. Maui is paused.

Waikiki tours start with a shuttle boat ride from their dock near Hilton Hawaiian Village, followed by about 45 minutes underwater. Passengers may see coral, tropical fish, turtles, and artificial reefs made from sunken ships and planes. The subs are Coast Guard certified, and narration plays in multiple languages.

Atlantis pitches its tours as educational, sustainable, and family-friendly. The battery system avoids fuel discharge, and routes are chosen to protect reefs. It’s one of Hawaii’s most durable and regulated ocean experiences, which makes the Semisub scheme look even more empty by comparison.

The Semisub fantasy that failed.

Semisub Inc. tried to borrow from the Atlantis playbook, at least on paper. Its promotional materials offered up glossy renderings of sleek, next-gen vessels outfitted with luxury seating, oversized underwater windows, and the promise of a world-class experience.

The pitch name-dropped major cruise lines, cited Coast Guard approvals, and claimed that sea trials were already underway. The brochures looked polished. The website was confident. But according to prosecutors, none of it was true.

Behind the scenes, court records show the couple was using investor money for personal travel, inflated salaries, and day-to-day expenses. They created fake invoices and invented correspondence to back their story. At one point, they even pointed to fabricated letters of intent from cruise companies as justification for raising more cash.

There were no shipyards, no subs under construction, no contracts in motion. Just the illusion of momentum, built on borrowed legitimacy from Hawaii’s long-standing ocean tourism industry. By echoing the look and language of real operators like Atlantis, the project looked just credible enough to fool people.

Investors bought into the dream. Hawaii clearly sells underwater magic well, and Semisub leaned hard into that. The setting, the story, and the visual appeal all worked together until they didn’t. Then the project unraveled only after a federal investigation exposed just how much of it had been smoke, mirrors, and marketing.

The photo, the former governor, and the fantasy.

One of the stranger turns in the Semisub fraud trial came when former Governor David Ige took the stand. Prosecutors said Curtiss Jackson had told investors he was close with Ige and had his backing.

That story didn’t hold up. Ige said he had never heard of Semisub One and didn’t know Jackson. The defense showed a photo from Ige’s 2014 inaugural ball, which Jackson had used in marketing. Ige shrugged it off.

Representing himself, Jackson asked if Ige remembered dancing with his wife, being on her Facebook page, or sitting two tables away. Ige didn’t. Then Jackson asked if he was seeing a doctor for memory problems. The courtroom reaction to that was somewhere between a wince and a laugh.

The photo was real. The connection wasn’t. But for investors skimming a pitch deck, it may have been enough to be duped.

Investors bought into the dream. Hawaii clearly sells underwater magic well, and Semisub leaned hard into that. The setting, the story, and the visual appeal all worked together until they didn’t. Then the project unraveled only after a federal investigation exposed just how much of it had been smoke, mirrors, and marketing.

The photo, the former governor, and the fantasy.

One of the stranger turns in the Semisub fraud trial came when former Governor David Ige took the stand. Prosecutors said Curtiss Jackson had told investors he was close with Ige and had his backing.

That story didn’t hold up. Ige said he had never heard of Semisub One and didn’t know Jackson. The defense showed a photo from Ige’s 2014 inaugural ball, which Jackson had used in marketing. Ige shrugged it off.

Representing himself, Jackson asked if Ige remembered dancing with his wife, being on her Facebook page, or sitting two tables away. Ige didn’t. Then Jackson asked if he was seeing a doctor for memory problems. The courtroom reaction to that was somewhere between a wince and a laugh.

The photo was real. The connection wasn’t. But for investors skimming a pitch deck, it may have been enough to be duped.

A lesson in image versus infrastructure.

This wasn’t some tourists getting hustled at the dock. It was something quieter, and in a way, more dangerous. The pitch worked because it sounded just close enough to real. Hawaii has reefs, cruise ships, innovation, and a long track record of doing ocean tourism well. A next-gen submarine? Sure, why not.

But when Hawaii gets used as a prop for fantasy ventures, the damage runs deeper than just lost money. It chips away at trust in what’s actually here, and in the people trying to do it right.

The real subs are still out there.

Atlantis Submarines is still running in Hawaii, just not like it used to. Some routes have paused, but off Waikiki and Kona, the battery-powered vessels still take visitors down to see what’s left of the reef. No goggles. No getting wet. Just a slow descent and a window seat on the ocean.

It’s not flashy. It doesn’t promise the world. But it’s real. And for plenty of visitors, that’s enough.

That’s part of what makes the Semisub story so frustrating. The fraud didn’t just take money. It leaned on the real work that others here have been doing for decades. Quiet, careful, and actually underwater.

Check Out some of our other blog articles: Here

Florida-based vacation rental company files for bankruptcy

by: Katlyn Fernandez

Posted: Aug 13, 2025 / 12:41 PM EDT

Updated: Aug 13, 2025 / 01:00 PM EDT
Origin Article: here

TAMPA, Fla. (WFLA) — A vacation rental company based in Central Florida filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy this month.

NBC affiliate WBBH reported that the company, IPG Franchising, has faced a growing number of lawsuits. It attracted investors to purchase contracts to manage vacation rentals while handling the payments.

Some investors complained that the company had delayed or stopped making payments to them.

An IPG Franchising investor told WBBH that it has been months since the company has paid her anything. She estimated that her family is out of more than $200,000.

“It’s a huge amount of money. It’s our life savings. It’s money that was taken away from my children,” Jane Sonkin told Gulf Coast News earlier this year. “There’s no properties anymore. There’s no communication. We are left with nothing.”

WBBH reported that more than 80 creditors are listed in the bankruptcy filing. It showed that the company has less than $50,000 in estimated assets but has between $1 million and $10 million in liabilities.

According to records obtained by the news station, the owners of IPG Franchising also run other companies, including Island Attitude on Manasota Key, which managed vacation rentals in the area before it was devastated by Hurricane Milton.
For Our More Market News Click: Here

Short Term Rental Income in Costa Rica to Face New Tax Rules

By Tico Times
Origin Article: here

July 13, 2025
Property owners in Costa Rica who rent accommodations through popular platforms like Airbnb or Booking.com will soon face a new tax obligation. The General Directorate of Taxation (DGT) announced that a 12.75% tax will apply to rental income generated through these digital platforms, starting at the end of 2026.

By that time, tax authorities expect to receive detailed data from these platforms about users renting properties in Costa Rica. This information will improve traceability and enable more effective tax collection, as part of the government’s efforts to incorporate short-term rentals into the formal tax system.

Mario Ramos, director of the DGT, urged all individuals engaged in this commercial activity to register as taxpayers to avoid fines or sanctions once enforcement begins. He stressed the importance of early compliance to prevent any legal complications.

Finance Minister Nogui Acosta emphasized that the policy is designed to promote tax justice rather than excessive taxation. He also criticized a bill currently under discussion in the Legislative Assembly, which proposes reforms to the Code of Tax Norms and Procedures, calling it disproportionate and unnecessary.

The ability to obtain user information from digital platforms is made possible through an agreement signed with the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). This agreement facilitates international cooperation in tax matters and supports the government’s efforts to collect revenue more efficiently.

Airbnb has already been applying a 13% Value Added Tax (VAT) on service fees in Costa Rica since 2022, following its inclusion on the official list of taxable lodging platforms.

This new tax regulation is part of a broader digital tax framework introduced in October 2020 under the Law for the Strengthening of Public Finances, which implemented VAT on cross-border digital services such as streaming platforms, software, gaming, and transportation apps.

Authorities strongly advise rental hosts to regularize their tax status well before the enforcement date to ensure full compliance and avoid penalties.
For Our Other Articles Click: Here

What are the ethics of allowing more short-term rentals in Avon?

By Zoe Goldstein, Vail Daily

The Avon Town Council on Tuesday discussed the ethics of allowing short-term rentals in town while reviewing an application to expand the town’s short-term rental overlay.

The applicant is The Kestrel, formerly McGrady Acres, a free-market townhome development located at the end of Eaglebend Drive, next to Post Boulevard, across the street from unincorporated Eagle County. The 24-unit luxury development applied to be included within Avon’s short-term rental overlay.

At the center of the discussion were two questions: What do short-term rentals do for the resort economy? Do they help or hurt locals in a challenging housing market?

In Avon, short-term rentals are managed by the town in two ways: Zone districting and individually permitted licenses.

Short-term rentals are not included within Avon’s regular zone designations. When the town approves an area for short-term rentals, it is added to the town’s short-term rental overlay, a secondary map that is, in essence, laid on top of the town’s regular zoning map.

Avon’s short-term rental overlay was established in 2009.

Units in Avon can only be rented out short-term if they are included in the short-term rental overlay and licensed by the town. Being in the overlay does not automatically mean units are allowed to operate as short-term rentals; the overlay merely gives developments the ability to apply for licensing to contain short-term rentals. Town staff manages short-term rental licenses.

Within Avon, there are three types of short-term rental designations: Unlimited, which allows a unit to be short-term rented year-round; limited, which allows a unit to be short-term rented for up to six weeks per year; and resident-occupied, which permits year-round short-term renting of part of a home while the unit owner lives in another part.

Avon’s short-term rental regulations also differ between units inside and outside of the town core. Developments outside of the town core on the short-term rental overlay are allowed to have a maximum of 15% of their units operate as unlimited short-term rentals.

The Kestrel was not initially included in Avon’s short-term rental overlay because at the time, the town only looked at existing properties when it was establishing the which areas would receive designation.

“There wasn’t an intent to include it or exclude it,” said Eric Heil, Avon town manager.

The Kestrel is located outside of the town core and so would be subject to a 15% cap on full licenses only, meaning up to three of its units can be unlimited short-term rentals.

“At this time, we have a couple of people who are interested in doing a partial short-term rental, but it’s a luxury property, so everybody doesn’t want it,” said Andrea McMillen, representing The Kestrel.

The development is self-contained, with one way in and out.

“It’s not adding to any neighborhood problems that way,” McMillen said.

Which units are permitted the short-term rental designation would be determined on a first-come, first-served basis, McMillen said. (The Kestrel contains one deed-restricted unit, which, like all deed-restricted units in Eagle County, is not permitted to have short-term rentals.)

The Kestrel HOA will require short term rentals to host for a minimum of three days. “We don’t allow one night or anything because nobody wants parties,” McMillen said.

After working extensively with The Kestrel and reviewing its application materials, town staff recommended that the council approve including the development in the town’s short-term rental overlay.

“We find it is fitting for this type of resort development to have short-term rentals,” said Jena Skinner, Avon’s planning manager.

Council member Lindsay Hardy spoke out against approving The Kestrel’s application to join Avon’s short-term rental overlay.

“I believe short-term rentals, they are a cultural shift from community to commodity,” Hardy said. “Overtourism is putting a strain on local services, and I do believe additional short-term rental licenses will put an additional strain that we cannot accommodate.”

“As long as working locals are sleeping in cars, I will not vote “yes’ to expand unlimited short-term rental licenses or zoning expansions anywhere within our town,” Hardy said.

Hardy said she believed the application did not satisfy one of the criteria required for the council to approve the application, which dictates that “the rezoning is not likely to result in adverse impacts upon the natural environment, including air, water, noise, stormwater management, wildlife and vegetation, or such impacts will be substantially mitigated.”

“If one unit is consistently rented, let’s say, 300 days a year, it now needs more cleaning people, it now needs more maybe plumbers, electricians, or teams to help keep this home turned over constantly,” Hardy said. “For every additional cleaning person that we need in town, we need to be able to house them.”

Council member Ruth Stanley and Mayor Tamra Nottingham Underwood said the 15% limit on short-term rental units made them more comfortable approving the short-term rental overlay update.

A short-term rental unit in Avon is taxed differently from other units. Short-term rentals must collect and remit to the town 10% of the price paid for the rental. Eight percent of that is sales tax and accommodation tax, which goes toward the town’s general fund, while the 2% short-term rental tax is earmarked for the town’s community housing fund.

“So, in effect, it would work toward mitigating some of the issues that Lindsay has brought up,” said Council member Gary Brooks.

Heil elaborated on the conundrum that short-term rentals pose to mountain communities like Avon.

“We’re a resort community. The majority of our budget comes from the resort economy, and the majority of our funding to pay for all of the things we do comes from that resort economy,” Heil said.

With only two hotels in Avon, “most of our (visitor) lodging is short-term rentals,” Heil said.

“My opinion, when I look at this, is, whether you allow it or not, at $2.5 to 5 million, the cheap units you’re starting out at a $15,000 a month mortgage payment,” Heil said. “If you don’t allow short-term rental, they’re not going to be available to local workforces the way I see those economics. And then, if it’s a second home, is it better to see it vacant most of the year, or is it better to allow it to be used and have additional lodging opportunities for visitors?”

The council approved the application’s first reading 5-1, with Hardy casting the dissenting vote. The council will review the application again on May 27.
For Last Months Article Click: Here

Save your favourites, leave reviews and list your property. Get access to specials and so much more when you sign up.

Sign Up

By signing up you can save your favourites, leave reviews and list your property. Get access to specials and so much more.