BRnX Travel

Sign Up > Maximize your true earning potential > Get your rental

How a UK accreditation program raises the bar for short-term rentals

Article Written By: by Paris Achen | Hosting and Management, Property Care, Short-Term Rental Regulation, STR Advocacy 101

When Merilee Karr co-founded the Short Term Accommodation Association (STAA) in the UK in 2017, she kept hearing the same frustrating refrain from government leaders and traditional hospitality groups: short-term rentals had no standards. Never mind the growing ranks of professional operators or the increasing list of safety regulations already on the books. The narrative persisted, and it was hurting the industry’s credibility.

“It used to drive me crazy when they’d say there are no standards in your industry,” Merilee recalled, “because A, there are a bunch of regulations that do apply to our industry, but B, there are also a lot of companies in the industry who are absolutely driving very high standards.”

Rather than fighting the perception through debate, Merilee and STAA decided to do something bigger – launch a third-party accreditation program that would meet the hospitality sector where it already was, with high standards backed by industry expertise and neutral third-party verification.

“We wanted to have an independent, third party, which was not the association…because otherwise you end up in a conflict of interest that the association is marking its own members, and you don’t want to score them down because they’re going to get angry.” 

STAA explored partnerships with three accreditation providers before choosing Quality in Tourism (QiT), a UK-based accreditation body with decades of experience evaluating hotels and hospitality providers, including through the VisitEngland program

Together, STAA and QiT created the Safe, Clean, and Legal short-term rental accreditation designed to reflect the professionalism, safety, and quality already present in much of the industry but often invisible to policymakers and consumers.

Unlike self-certifications, which Merilee said often amount to checking your homework, this accreditation involves in-person inspections by QiT, which evaluate properties on everything from health and safety compliance to cleanliness, guest communications, and operational processes. The accreditation criteria vary according to the jurisdiction, but at minimum, applicants could be required to provide documentation of public liability insurance, employers liability insurance, risk assessments, fire safety measures such as PAT testing or electrical installation checks, Gas Safe certificate, Wholesome Water Report, site license, planning permission, local legislative requirements such as boarding permits or operating certificates, and other compliance records.

What surprised Merilee was how much overlap there was between STRs and hotels when it came to accreditation criteria.

“To my surprise, it was 95% the same,” Merilee said.

The unique aspect of accrediting vacation rentals is judging whether a property is a three-star, four-star, or five-star, which requires more subjectivity than assessing hotels. 

Today, any STR property in the UK can seek accreditation from QiT. Operators must complete an online application form, pay the fee, and upload copies of their required documents to their dedicated QiT member portal. A QiT assessor will then visit the property to assess whether it meets the standards of the Safe, Clean, and Legal accreditation. The fee starts at 99 British pounds ($134) but varies depending on the number of properties in the portfolio. For larger agency-level accreditation (Quality Accredited Company or QAC), prices start at 1,200 British pounds ($1,626).

More than 15,000 individual properties hold an STR accreditation from QiT. The number is likely much higher, given that the QAC accreditation is for property agencies. QiT doesn’t have a definitive figure for how many properties each of these agencies represents, as it changes constantly, but some have thousands of properties in their books, said QiT COO Ruth Robinson.

Once approved, hosts and operators receive a badge they can display on their websites, listings, and marketing materials to signal quality, safety, and trust to potential guests.


The badge became a lifeline and a lever for growth when the COVID-19 pandemic shut down most of the tourism economy.

Thanks to its independently verified standards, the STR industry in the UK was able to make a case for reopening a whole month before hotels. Operators who could demonstrate compliance through accreditation were allowed to open their doors to guests, while hotels remained shuttered.

That accreditation also opened another door: the UK’s National Health Service (NHS) urgently needed places to house frontline workers during the early months of the pandemic. With hotel space limited, professional STR operators across the UK stepped in, donating more than 20 million British pounds ($25.7 million) in free stays through a program called NHS Homes.

“Our frustration at that time was, well, the government was paying the Holiday Inn and different people to house NHS workers, and they weren’t paying our sector,” Merilee recounted.

NHS officials told the STAA they couldn’t pay for STR bookings because the industry had no standards, Merilee recounted. In fact, the STAA did have standards through the accreditation program, but not all short-term rentals in the NHS Homes program had accreditation.

The STAA and Crown Commercial Service (the UK Government procurement arm) negotiated an arrangement in which the NHS would buy stays in short-term rentals, provided that only accredited properties were offered through the NHS Homes program.

“We were able to…have one contracting party with the government, and we could bring everyone in under the association who was accredited to be able to sell it to government for the first time,” Merilee explained.

Trusted Stays became the distribution network for accredited STR operators in the UK to contract directly with the government. Operators who achieved accreditation could list their properties on Trusted Stays, which distributed inventory to government agencies and major travel management companies via the Global Distribution System (GDS), a platform that centralizes travel services like flights, lodging, and car rentals in one place so that travel agents can quickly compare prices. This was the first time accredited short-term rentals became accessible for government bookings, corporate stays, and business travel at scale. Suddenly, companies like Amex Travel, a travel agency for American Express clients, and CWT (formerly Carlson Wagonlit Travel), a major corporate travel agency, could now see and book vacation rentals just like they would a hotel. It also made STR listings accessible to companies that handle their own travel planning and send out requests for proposals to choose preferred accommodations for their employees.

“We put that accreditation in the photos on any of the platforms where we operate,” Merilee said. “It is something that we get feedback from customers that they value.”

Looking ahead, Merilee believes accreditation will be central to the evolution of short-term rentals. As more jurisdictions seek to regulate the industry, having a credible, independently verified badge can help distinguish between professional operators and bad amateurs.

“Accreditation is a great way to [ensure compliance] without…having to have a whole body of inspectors,” Merilee said. “It’s also then industry-funded. So, you don’t need to raise money to pay for government to be doing inspections when actually industry goes out and does it themselves.”

For operators, accreditation helps them stay in compliance and constantly improve their business

“Accreditation is more like an inexpensive consultant coming, looking at your portfolio, looking at your processes, and saying, look, if you can improve here, here, and here, we’ll accredit you,” Merilee said.

She has embraced that approach as CEO of UnderTheDoormat Group and Veeve, both of which have maintained accreditation at all of their properties since 2017.

“I’ve always appreciated accreditation, especially as an owner of a business,” she said. “It’s an external third party who are telling my team how they can get better, and that is invaluable.” This is many of the reasons why its so important to make sure that you get your property Verified, Trusted, and Accredited.

Start to see if you can get Compliant first.

Here’s Why Honolulu Doesn’t Enforce Law Against Short-Term Rental Companies

By Ben Angarone

The head of Honolulu’s permitting department told the City Council last week why the city doesn’t enforce a 2019 law that bars companies such as Airbnb and Vrbo from allowing people to book illegal short-term rentals.

Department of Planning and Permitting Director Dawn Takeuchi Apuna said the city agreed not to enforce a provision in the law in order to settle a lawsuit filed by a group representing owners of vacation rentals.

She told Civil Beat in an interview after the hearing that the city probably won’t act anytime soon to enforce the portion of the law that requires hosting platforms to submit monthly reports on bookings. 

“It’s very risky, because they’re going to probably sue us,” she said, referring to the Kokua Coalition, the group that went to court to block parts of the 2019 law.

That’s not what she told Civil Beat in May when a reporter asked about the law. She said the permitting department prefers to treat companies like Airbnb as partners rather than adversaries, and that the department works with them to keep scofflaws off the platform.

Department officials have not explained why they didn’t say anything until last week about the agreement not to enforce the law.

After the council meeting, Civil Beat sent an email asking when Takeuchi Apuna, who wasn’t with DPP when the law was passed, had learned about the lawsuit.

Spokesperson Curtis Lum sent a written statement attributed to Takeuchi Apuna that said, “The Department of Planning and Permitting was part of that suit, so DPP and Corporation Counsel were obviously well aware of that suit and settlement from its inception.”

Civil Beat called Lum and sent a follow-up email to ask why no one had mentioned the settlement before. Takeuchi Apuna responded Wednesday morning in an email, saying her initial answer in May of why they don’t enforce against the platforms was accurate despite not being exhaustive.

“This term is one of many – not the only – policy considerations for us in determining whether we should or should not enforce against the platforms,” she said.

Holding platforms accountable – and using those reports to see if vacationers were booking unregistered short-term rentals – was a big part of the 2019 law.

Instead, the city goes after owners of illegal rentals. But city officials have acknowledged it’s hard to crack down on them, in part because operators learn to evade detection. Some list their properties when city investigators aren’t on the clock. Some jump to another platform if their listings are shut down on one website. One operator racked up almost $1 million in fines before the city moved to foreclose on his property.

Though some say illegal short-term rentals aren’t as common as when the council passed the 2019 law, they’re still a problem. Inside Airbnb, an organization that works to combat the negative effects of short-term rentals, says the site has about 7,900 listings on Oʻahu.

About 1,800 properties are registered with the city as short-term rentals, and more than 700 additional units were grandfathered in decades ago. Another group — more than 1,800 units — aren’t registered but operate legally within hotels. Conservatively, that would mean hundreds of illegal rentals are still operating in the city.

Lawsuit Followed Ordinance

The city’s short-term rental law attempted to balance the negative effects of short-term rentals, such as a diminished housing supply, with the economic benefits to property owners who rent to vacationers.

It took effect Aug. 1, 2019. The same day, the Kokua Coalition, doing business as the Hawaii Vacation Rental Owners Association, went to federal court to block parts of it.

The law allows short-term rentals of less than 30 days only in Oʻahu’s resort zones and some surrounding areas, and only if they register with the city. Registering triggers a higher property tax rate.

The law bars hosting platforms such as Airbnb and Vrbo from collecting a fee to book an unregistered short-term rental. Those platforms are required to register with the city and to submit monthly reports detailing bookings in the city.

Violating any of those provisions carries a fine of $1,000 to $10,000 per day.

In its lawsuit, the Kokua Coalition claimed that the city’s initial enforcement effort, before the law took effect, was “sloppy.” Hundreds of people operating legally were erroneously threatened with $10,000 fines, they alleged.

They also argued that the requirement for monthly reports violated state and federal protections of the privacy of electronic communications as well as the Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable searches and seizures.

About two months later, the vacation rental owners and the city reached a deal to end the suit.

In the agreement, which was included in a court order dismissing the case, the city acknowledged that courts have blocked other cities from enforcing similar ordinances. The agreement noted court orders in New York City, Boston, Portland, Oregon, and Los Angeles.

“Based on its understanding of the current state of the law and its interests in avoiding unnecessary litigation, DPP does not currently intend to enforce” the provision allowing it to penalize platforms that fail to provide monthly reports, the agreement says.

The city agreed to give the Kokua Coalition 60 days’ notice if it intended to enforce that provision, which would give the group a chance to sue to stop it.

City’s Explanation Changes

Some cities have decided to hold platforms accountable for illegal listings, which two law professors have held up as a best practice.

Civil Beat asked DPP about the 2019 law several times in early May, both by email and in interviews. We first inquired how many times the city has fined hosting companies; Lum, the spokesperson, said it had never done so. We asked to see the monthly reports; Takeuchi Apuna said they had never received any.

When we asked how many platforms had registered, spokesperson Davis Pitner said none had done so.

No one mentioned the lawsuit.Asked why the platforms weren’t submitting monthly reports, Takeuchi Apuna said the department didn’t need them to do its job.

“If reports are something that would help us better enforce, then we would probably ask for that,” she said.

During last week’s council meeting, however, Takeuchi Apuna testified during a presentation on DPP’s strategy for short-term rental enforcement that the department doesn’t get booking reports because of the court order in the Kokua Coalition lawsuit. If the city tried to get them, “they will be ready to litigate,” she said.

She reiterated her belief that the city doesn’t need the reports: “We believe the reporting info may be helpful, but it’s not crucial based on the type of enforcements we currently are exercising.”

The lead lawyer for Kokua Coalition, Greg Kugle, said he didn’t have time to talk about the case. Efforts to reach officers in the group were unsuccessful. Another lawyer declined to comment.

That agreement between the city and Kokua Coalition doesn’t stop the city from enforcing other parts of the 2019 law, however: the provisions allowing the city to penalize hosting companies for failing to register and for facilitating bookings of illegal rentals.

In May, Takeuchi Apuna explained the city’s lack of enforcement of those provisions by citing a federal law that shields tech companies from liability when it comes to free speech, saying it could apply to vacation rental platforms.

Council member Tyler Dos Santos-Tam said he was surprised to hear Takeuchi Apuna’s new explanation. He said he had tried to get those booking reports sometime last year and was told the department didn’t have them. He didn’t pursue the matter.

Despite the privacy concerns claimed by vacation rental owners, he said he thinks the city should request the data anyway.

“I think we need to go back and find as much information as possible, and get the platforms to give us this information in a reasonable way,” he said.

One option, he said, would be to get anonymized data, which would enable the city to see where rentals operate and how long guests stay in them. That, he said, could inform future legislation.

When there is uncertainty in the STR market, you can be sure that having an Accredited property is the gold standard and helps with staying at the top of mind in the Vacation Rental Space.

Start to see if you can get Compliant first.

Save your favourites, leave reviews and list your property. Get access to specials and so much more when you sign up.

Sign Up

By signing up you can save your favourites, leave reviews and list your property. Get access to specials and so much more.