BRnX Travel

Sign Up > Maximize your true earning potential > Get your rental

Florida Tourism Law: Key Regulations for Businesses and Visitors

LegalClarity Florida

Published Mar 21, 2025

Florida’s tourism industry is a major driver of its economy, attracting millions of visitors each year. To regulate businesses and protect consumers, the state has established laws impacting hotels, vacation rentals, theme parks, cruise lines, and other tourism-related enterprises. These regulations ensure safety, fairness, and compliance with local policies.

Understanding these legal requirements is essential for both business owners and visitors to avoid fines or disputes.

Hospitality Business Licensing

Operating a hospitality business in Florida requires compliance with licensing regulations enforced by the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation (DBPR). Hotels, motels, bed-and-breakfasts, and other lodging establishments must obtain a public lodging license under Chapter 509 of the Florida Statutes. Licensing fees vary based on the number of rental units, with a hotel of 51-75 rooms paying $325 annually, while smaller establishments with fewer than 25 rooms pay $175. Businesses must also pass inspections to ensure compliance with health and safety standards.

Food service establishments within hospitality businesses require a separate license from the DBPR’s Division of Hotels and Restaurants. Compliance with sanitation requirements outlined in Rule 61C-1 of the Florida Administrative Code is mandatory, including regular inspections and adherence to food safety protocols. Failure to maintain proper licensing can lead to fines or suspension of operations.

Liquor licensing is another requirement for hospitality businesses serving alcohol. The Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco (ABT) issues various liquor licenses, such as the 4COP-SFS license for restaurants generating at least 51% of their revenue from food sales. Fees vary by county, ranging from $624 to over $1,800 annually. Businesses must also comply with the Responsible Vendor Act, which promotes alcohol safety training to reduce liability risks.

Short-Term Rental Restrictions

Florida balances property owners’ rights with tourism industry interests through short-term rental regulations. While state law prevents local governments from banning vacation rentals, municipalities can enforce zoning, occupancy limits, and registration requirements. Miami Beach and Orlando, for example, impose minimum stay requirements and licensing mandates.

Property owners in many counties must register their rentals and obtain a local business tax receipt. Safety compliance, including fire alarms, carbon monoxide detectors, and proper egress routes, is mandatory. Some jurisdictions also require guest logs and periodic inspections. Homeowners’ associations and condominium boards may impose additional restrictions, such as minimum rental periods or board approval requirements. Violations can result in fines, property liens, or legal disputes.

Amusement and Theme Park Requirements

Florida’s amusement and theme parks must comply with safety and accessibility regulations. The Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS) oversees amusement rides under Chapter 616 of the Florida Statutes, requiring annual inspections for most attractions. Major theme parks like Walt Disney World, Universal Orlando, and SeaWorld are exempt from state inspections if they employ at least 1,000 full-time workers and maintain internal safety programs. However, they must report injuries and accidents under the Fair Rides Inspection Program.

Theme parks must also adhere to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Florida-specific accessibility laws, ensuring wheelchair-accessible pathways, auxiliary aids for hearing-impaired guests, and accommodations for cognitive disabilities. The Unruh Civil Rights Act prohibits discrimination in public accommodations, requiring equal access policies.

Liability waivers are commonly used by amusement parks but do not protect against claims of gross negligence or willful misconduct. Florida courts have ruled that general disclaimers cannot absolve businesses from responsibility if safety standards are knowingly disregarded. This legal framework encourages strict ride operator training, maintenance schedules, and emergency response protocols.

Cruise Regulations

Florida, home to major cruise ports in Miami, Fort Lauderdale, and Port Canaveral, regulates cruise operations through state and federal laws. The Florida Uniform Port Access Code standardizes vessel entry and exit procedures to enhance security and environmental protection. The Florida Seaport Transportation and Economic Development (FSTED) Program funds infrastructure improvements to accommodate larger cruise ships.

Passenger safety falls under the federal Cruise Vessel Security and Safety Act (CVSSA), which mandates crime reporting, cabin security measures, and trained medical personnel for handling sexual assault cases. Florida reinforces these protections by requiring cruise terminals to comply with state accessibility laws and emergency preparedness standards. Environmental regulations restrict waste discharge within Florida waters to protect marine ecosystems.

Consumer Protection in Tourism Marketing

Florida’s tourism marketing is regulated to prevent deceptive advertising and ensure transparency. The Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (FDUTPA) prohibits false or misleading promotions, requiring businesses to disclose all material terms of an offer. For example, if a resort advertises an all-inclusive stay, it must clearly define what is included and disclose additional fees. FDUTPA violations can result in fines of up to $10,000 per offense, with higher penalties for targeting seniors or individuals with disabilities.

Timeshare sales, a key part of Florida’s tourism economy, are governed by the Florida Vacation Plan and Timesharing Act. This law mandates a five-day rescission period for buyers to cancel a purchase without penalty and requires full disclosure of maintenance fees, special assessments, and usage restrictions. The Florida Attorney General’s Office actively investigates fraudulent timeshare resale schemes, imposing fines and ordering restitution for affected consumers.

Personal Injury Liability

Tourism-related businesses in Florida must adhere to premises liability laws, which hold property owners responsible for maintaining safe environments. If a tourist is injured due to unsafe conditions—such as a wet floor without warning signs or faulty equipment—the business may be held liable. Florida follows a modified comparative negligence rule, barring recovery if the injured party is more than 50% responsible for their injury.

Slip and fall cases, a common source of litigation, require injured parties to prove that a business had actual or constructive knowledge of a hazardous condition and failed to address it. Cruise ships operate under maritime law, often involving federal jurisdiction. Recreational activities such as parasailing and jet skiing are regulated under Chapter 327 of the Florida Statutes, requiring operators to carry liability insurance and follow safety guidelines. Noncompliance can result in lawsuits, regulatory fines, or criminal penalties for gross negligence.

Tourism Tax Provisions

Florida imposes several tourism-related taxes affecting businesses and visitors. The Tourist Development Tax, or “bed tax,” applies to short-term rentals, hotels, and resorts, with rates ranging from 2% to 6% depending on the county. Revenue funds local tourism promotion, beach restoration, and infrastructure projects. Businesses that fail to collect and remit this tax face penalties, including fines and potential legal action from the Florida Department of Revenue.

A 6% state sales tax applies to most goods and services, including theme park tickets, guided tours, and boat rentals. Some counties impose an additional discretionary surtax. Rental car transactions are subject to a separate $2 per day surcharge, which funds transportation projects. Businesses must maintain accurate records and file timely tax reports to avoid audits and penalties.

BRnX Verified. BRnX Accredited. BRnX Trusted.
That’s how you meet the new traveler where they are.

👉 Accredit your property and redefine luxury

New law empowers Summit County, Colorado, to force short-term rental marketplaces like Airbnb to take down unlicensed listings

https://www.avalara.com/mylodgetax/en/blog/2024/10/new-law-empowers-summit-county-colorado-to-force-short-term-rental-marketplaces-like-airbnb-to-take-down-unlicensed-listings.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Oct 29, 2024 | Jennifer Sokolowsky

A new ordinance in Summit County, Colorado, requires short-term rental (STR) marketplaces such as Airbnb and Vrbo to include a valid county STR permit number in all property listings. Under the ordinance, marketplaces must also delete illegal listings when notified by county officials. While the measure doesn’t change the county’s STR regulations, it offers the county a new avenue for enforcing the rules. With limited resources, enforcement has been a challenge for county authorities.

The ordinance follows on the heels of a statewide law passed in 2023 that gave counties authority to a regulate vacation rental service, defined as “a person that operates a website or any other digital platform that provides a means through which an owner or owner’s agent may offer lodging, unit, or portion thereof for short-term rentals and from which the person financially benefits.”

The law allows counties specific powers to require STR marketplaces to help them enforce rules around licensing. Other Colorado jurisdictions — including Boulder, Douglas, Clear Creek, and Larimer counties — have used this legislation as a springboard to craft laws similar to Summit County’s.

Colorado isn’t the only government using regulation of STR marketplaces to aid in enforcement of STR laws. Other jurisdictions that have passed similar laws recently include Monterey, California, San Antonio, Texas, and Rhode Island.

County regulations require operators to be licensed

Summit County first passed STR regulations in 2018 and updated them most recently in 2023. Under the law, STR hosts in unincorporated areas of the county must:

  • Register with the county annually
  • Designate an agent responsible for responding to problems with the rental within an hour
  • Follow safety, occupancy, and parking rules

The ordinance established a Neighborhood Overlay Zone and a Resort Overlay Zone for STRs, with stricter rules in the neighborhood zone in terms of limits on numbers of licenses and the number of nights per year properties can operate as STRs. The majority of STRs in the county are located in the resort zone, which includes Keystone, Copper Mountain, Tiger Run Resort, and unincorporated areas at the base of Peak 8 in Breckenridge.

Lodging tax compliance for Summit County short-term rental hosts

In addition to following operational rules, Summit County vacation rental owners must register for a tax license with the state and collect state sales tax from guests. STRs are also subject to a Summit County short-term rental lodging tax that was approved by voters in 2022. STR operators are responsible for collecting all required taxes and submitting them to the proper tax authorities, unless their STR marketplace collects taxes for them.

In Summit County, Airbnb and Vrbo automatically collect state and county lodging taxes for their hosts when guests pay. Even if a rental marketplace collects lodging taxes, Colorado hosts are still required to register for a state tax license and file regular lodging tax returns.

MyLodgeTax can automate and simplify short-term rental tax compliance, including registration and filing with state and local tax authorities. For more on short-term rental taxes in Colorado, see our Colorado vacation rental tax guide. If you have tax questions related to vacation rental properties, drop us a line and we’ll get back to you with answers.

BRnX Verified. BRnX Accredited. BRnX Trusted.
That’s how you meet the new traveler where they are.

👉 Accredit your property and redefine luxury

New Tax Reporting Rules for Airbnb and Digital Rentals in Costa Rica (Effective 2025)

https://quatro.legal/new-tax-reporting-rules-for-airbnb-and-digital-rentals-in-costa-rica-effective-2025/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Quatro Legal Real Estate Team | Oct 07, 2025

Under Resolution MH-DGT-RES-0025-2024, any digital platform that lists or processes payments for short-term rentals must verify the information of their hosts and submit an annual report to the Tax Administration.

In practice, this means platforms will begin asking you to confirm or update your personal and property details. They’ll also cross-check that information against public records to make sure everything lines up.

For property owners and hosts, it’s important to understand what this regulation involves and how to stay compliant.

Why this matters and how can it affect you:

Costa Rica’s Tax Administration has formalized new reporting duties for “Digital Platform Operators” (think Airbnb-style marketplaces and listing/payment platforms). These operators must collect, validate, and report specific data about reportable sellers (hosts/owners who rent property) each year. Failure to report can trigger fines of 2% of the prior year’s gross income, with a minimum of 3 and a maximum of 100 base salaries. If the missing info is filed within 3 days after the deadline, the fine may be reduced by 75%.

What Changed?

  • Before: Hosts and property managers simply had to register and declare taxes on their own, and many slipped under the radar.
  • Now: Platforms themselves must verify and report your information directly to the Tax Administration. Non-compliance is no longer invisible.

You count as a reportable seller if you meet any of these conditions: a) you reside in Costa Rica or a reportable jurisdiction, b) you rent out real estate located in Costa Rica, and/or c) you receive payments in Costa Rica or a reportable jurisdiction for those rentals. Platforms that are Costa Rican tax residents, incorporated or managed from Costa Rica, or that facilitate rentals in Costa Rica are within scope of these new duties. 

What does platforms must collect from you:

Platforms will request and verify at least the following from hosts and property managers:

  • Full legal name and primary address
  • Costa Rican taxpayer ID (NITE/DTI)
  • Date of birth (individuals) or registration date (companies)
  • Property details. All information must be consistent with the National Registry.

This information must be reported by the platforms to the Tax Administration by January 31 of the year after the activity occurred (i.e., 2025 activity reported by January 31, 2026).

Information related to a reportable seller will not be shared with the Costa Rican Tax Administration or the seller if the Reporting Platform Operator has obtained sufficient assurance that another platform is fulfilling the reporting obligations.

How this fits with your existing obligations:

These platform reports do not replace your ordinary duties as a host or owner. You still need to:

a. Register with the Tax Administration (as individual or entity) for short-term rental activities.

Every host or owner offering short-term stays in Costa Rica must register with the Tax Administration (Ministerio de Hacienda) as a taxpayer and activate the correct economic activity (short term rentals) in the virtual platform using the D-140 registration form. This applies to both individuals and companies. From registration onward, you are required to issue electronic invoices, maintain income and expense records, file monthly VAT returns where applicable, submit the annual income tax return, and pay your taxes accordingly.

b. Align with municipal licensing rules and any ICT requirements that apply to your rental model.

Short term rentals must register with the Costa Rican Tourism Institute (ICT) in the Non-Traditional Rental Registry before operating; the filing is completed online and ICT issues an inscription resolution and user code. Operating without registering, or failing to keep your record updated within one month of any change, constitutes illegal operation under the framework law. ICT maintains a public, searchable registry and shares the data electronically with the Tax Administration for enforcement and tax control.

Additionally, depending on the canton, your activity may be treated as a commercial service that requires a municipal business license (“patente”). Where applicable, you must obtain the patente from the local municipality before operating or advertising, and keep it current. Operating without a patente where one is required can lead to local fines, closures, or enforcement actions, so confirm the rules with your specific municipality.

c. Use compliant contracts (e.g., guest agreements, liability waivers) and keep clear revenue records.

Quatro Legal is here to help you stay compliant, protected, and informed.

We offer the following services to help you either meet regulatory requirements or get started in the market:

  • Compliance with the Costa Rican Tourism Board (ICT).
  • Registration with the Tax Agency for short-term rentals.
  • Waiver of liability drafting.
  • Guidance on applicable rules and regulations.
  • Drafting of short-term rental agreements.
  • Assistance in obtaining a municipal commercial license. 

BRnX Verified. BRnX Accredited. BRnX Trusted.
That’s how you meet the new traveler where they are.

👉 Accredit your property and redefine luxury

Maui Planning Commission advances vacation rental phase-out bill

 Brian Perry | July 25, 2024

The Maui Planning Commission heard more than seven hours of often impassioned testimony Tuesday, then deliberated nearly three hours before advising the Maui County Council to approve a bill to phase-out 7,000 short-term rentals in apartment districts, mostly in South and West Maui.

In the end, the commission voted 5-0 to recommend ending the decades-long grandfathered use of vacation rentals in apartment districts; those on the so-called Minatoya List. The commission’s action comes as Maui faces a housing emergency in the wake of the August 2023 wildfires disaster and steep challenges in building more housing, hampered by high building costs, scarce water and wastewater availability and vacant lands.

“Our community is screaming for this,” said Commissioner Ashley Lindsey, who said she has experience in property management of both long- and short-term rentals.

“Our community needs housing first,” she said. “We need to take care of our people. We need to do what’s right for Maui.”

There’s “lots of money in short-term rentals,” she said. It’s a great investment that “basically pays for your retirement and whatever else you want to do.”

However, “we were always supposed to have apartments in those areas,” she said. “People have been lucky to have used those short-term rentals for other reasons (until now), but getting back our communities is the most important part of being part of a community.”

Commissioner Mel Hipolito Jr. said the issue has led to some soul searching.

“I need to really take a deep dive in my heart, in my mind about the future,” he said. The future of “our loved ones, our families, even our families that’s not born yet.”

Hipolito said he’s aware of potential legal challenges, but “I truly believe the mayor and his team have done their due diligence.”

As for concerns about the bill’s economic impacts, the County Council will have the opportunity to investigate and assess those, he said.

Commission Chair Kimberly Thayer noted that the commission is only making a recommendation to the County Council. “We are just one step in the road,” she said. “But we are, you know, an important part of the process.”

“Zoning is not meant to be static,” she said. “It is meant to change over time to reflect the needs of the community.”

Maui County’s zoning code is “very, very old” and “very out of date and in need of change to reflect the current trends in our community, the desires of our people,” Thayer said.

She said the debate over the vacation rentals phase-out has brought up questions such as: “Who are we, and what do we want to be? What kind of future do we want for our keiki?”

Hawaiʻi has gone from a purely subsistence economy to “commercialization of our land,” plantation agriculture, and tourism, Thayer said. Now, “we are not unique in kind of being at a crossroads… There’s communities all over the whole entire world who have had to evolve over time, and now is our time to look at evolving.”

Now, the way Maui’s zoning districts are structured, and “the way our land is quote, unquote ‘used’ is not serving us right now,” she said. “The question is: what is the highest and best use?”

“It’s bubbling up that the best thing for our island and for our people is to change this piece of zoning to kind of change our trajectory into the future,” Thayer said. “This is not a decision that is taken lightly at all… We’re not making this decision for any of us. We’re making this decision for everybody who comes after us.”

The commission’s recommendation includes asking the Council to consider economic impacts found in a study by the University of Hawaiʻi Economic Research Organization, known as UHERO. That study, sought by the Bissen administration, is expected to be ready in time for Council consideration of the bill later this year.

This morning, the Council’s Housing and Land Use Committee, chaired by Council Member Tasha Kama, discussed a proposed request for proposals to study the phase-out of short-term rentals in apartment-zoned districts.

The commission also wants the Council to consider social, cultural, environmental and quality of life impacts. Commissioners recommended that the Council exclude vacation rental properties that community plans designate for hotel use or properties that are partially zoned hotel.

Commission members discussed at some length giving South Maui short-term vacation rental owners more time — as much as three to five years — to phase-out the transient use. However, Hipolito said, “I feel the need is now.” And, the idea was dropped.

When asked Tuesday evening about the timing of the proposed phase-out, Bissen told commissioners it was his decision to choose the effective dates because they reflect the “urgency that this deserves.”

Some people say it’s overdue by 35 years, and now, “you cannot say this is an emergency that needs to be done right away, and (then) say, ‘Let’s take five years,’ ” Bissen said.

As proposed, housing units in apartment-zoned districts will no longer be permitted as short-term visitor accommodations — as of July 1, 2025, for West Maui, and Jan. 1, 2026, for the rest of Maui County.

In the coming months, the Council will receive a Department of Planning report in support of the mayor’s proposal, as well as minutes of commission meetings on June 25 and Tuesday. In those two days of hearings, more than 250 people testified for and against the measure. And, there are several hundred pages of written testimony. (To read written testimony, go to the end of the Planning Department’s report here. Additional written testimonies submitted include those that came after posting June 25 part 1; and part 2July 9; and documents received after posting July 23 part 1 and part 2.)

On Tuesday, dozens of testifiers were roughly divided over whether residents or visitors should occupy apartments that have been used for decades as transient accommodations. Bill proponents maintained that it’s time to prioritize Maui’s resources, including housing and water, for residents, especially after the August 2023 wildfires that killed 102 in Lahaina and aggravated the island’s longtime housing shortage.

Bill opponents argued that eliminating vacation rentals in apartment-zoned districts would wreak widespread economic damage, lead to business closures and job losses, and threaten the livelihoods of owners dependent on income from their investment properties. They also said vacation rentals would not be converted to residential housing because they’re too expensive and inappropriate for housing because of a lack of living space, storage, parking and recreational areas.

Stephen Thiele, a Kamaole Sands condominium owner, asked the commission to “reject this draconian and unconstitutional bill.”

“This bill stands on the thin ice of a falsehood that the Minatoya properties were built for long-term workforce housing,” he said. “However, the facts are that many of these properties were clearly built to be vacation resorts, operated and managed by hotel companies.”

Thiele said a housing report submitted to the commission contains no information about skyrocketing apartment owner association fees and lacks a full analysis of devastating economic impacts if the bill were to become law. He predicted a class-action lawsuit, based on the constitutionality of taking away a recognized property right.

Maui Tomorrow Foundation Executive Director Albert Perez said decision-makers have ignored the policy of keeping the island’s visitor population below 33% of the resident population while also disregarding the purpose of apartment-zoned districts to provide high-density housing for long-term residents.

Decision-makers need to stop “approving luxury housing,” he said. “It uses up our infrastructure and brings more wealthy people who can pay more for everything.”

Perez cited a UHERO estimate that the phase-out bill would increase Maui’s housing inventory by 13%, “a dramatic increase that will lower housing prices, whether for sale or for rent.”

UHERO also says short-term rentals are operated by those who run multiple vacation properties who would likely sell or rent their units. “So many properties would likely be converted to long-term use,” Perez said.

While addressing commissioners’ questions Tuesday, Bissen also responded to the argument that vacation rentals would not be converted to residential use.

If an apartment unit becomes either owner-occupied or a long-term rental, “I think by it’s very nature, they will go to somebody who resides on Maui.”

The goal is to increase residential housing inventory, and even if a small percentage of conversion from vacation rental to housing yields even 500 units, then “I’ll take that,” Bissen said.

However, he said he thought the number of homes for residents will be higher than a few hundred because even if an owner has two, three or five homes, “you can only live in one.”

“If you can only live in one, what are you going to do with the others?” he asked. “Keep ‘um vacant?” Then owners face losing money on their investments, he pointed out. “If you’re losing money using it as a short term, then maybe switch the model and rent it to somebody long-term.”

Bissen also said his administration is committed to enforcing laws against illegal vacation rentals. He pointed out that his administration reversed a policy not to investigate anonymous complaints. “We’re gonna take every complaint, even if it’s anonymous,” he said.

The mayor said zoning should reflect actual use. So, if some apartment complexes operate as hotels, then they should get hotel zoning, Bissen said. “I mean, if you walk like a duck, you quack like a duck and look like a duck, you’re a duck.”

For decades, Maui County’s policy has been to allow transient vacation rentals to continue operating, legally, in apartment-zoned areas meant for residential use. This has led to real estate speculation, rising property values and an industry in support of vacation rental promotion, sales, management, cleaning and maintenance.

The county currently permits vacation rentals in A1 and A2 apartment districts, provided that units are in buildings constructed before April 21, 1989, and that owners meet other criteria, such as paying higher real property taxes and transient accommodations taxes.

Former Hawaiʻi Attorney General David Louie testified in opposition to the bill on behalf of client Airbnb, giving commission members a preview of likely legal challenges to the measure if it becomes law.

“This bill will effectively eliminate STRs, despite the fact that STRs have been lawful residential uses for decades,” he said.

Deputy Corporation Counsel Michael Hopper told commissioners that the Legislature’s recent change in the law allows the county to amortize, or phase-out, nonconforming uses over a reasonable period of time. That came after a change in “some case law that came up recently.”

Residential uses cannot be phased-out, he said, but recently passed legislation says vacation rental use, as defined by respective counties, would not count as a residential use.

So the legislation “made clear that that type of use (vacation rentals) can be phased out over a reasonable period of time,” he said.

Louie disputed the contention that the enactment of Senate Bill 2919 has paved the way for legally phasing out vacation rentals.

In written testimony, Louie said statutory protections for vacation rental owners derive from constitutional law. Even after statutory protections are removed, “the constitutional foundation remains,” he said. “Maui’s proposed TVR bill likely violates such constitutional protections.”

“The proposed TVR bill is likely unlawful, violating well-established rights under the United States and State of Hawaiʻi constitutions, and would invite years of lawsuits,” he said. “Both the State of Hawaiʻi and federal courts of Hawaiʻi have explicitly recognized the vested rights of apartment owners to use their homes for short-term rentals. As such, there is a likelihood that the TVR bill [will be] ultimately deemed unconstitutional.”

On Tuesday, a number of testifiers expressed concern that the proposed phase-out of vacation rentals has become a divisive, “us-versus-them issue.” Some suggested finding a middle ground and ways to address Maui’s housing crisis, such as using revenue generated by vacation rentals to pay for infrastructure needed for residential housing development.

Bissen told commissioners that “the last thing we wanted to do from the administration is to divide our community… This is the time for us to be together.”

“The whole idea is to make the inventory available for people who choose to make Maui home,” he said.

The Molokaʻi Planning Commission has recommended approval of the vacation rental phase-out, including a caveat that, if the Council were not to approve it for Maui, that the ban would still apply to Molokaʻi. The Lānaʻi Planning Commission remained neutral on the bill, but provided comments.

Commission Vice Chair Dale Thompson, who has a vacation rental property, was absent Tuesday and did not participate in the commission’s deliberations. The nine-member commission has three vacant seats.

BRnX Verified. BRnX Accredited. BRnX Trusted.
That’s how you meet the new traveler where they are.

👉 Accredit your property and redefine luxury

Save your favourites, leave reviews and list your property. Get access to specials and so much more when you sign up.

Sign Up

By signing up you can save your favourites, leave reviews and list your property. Get access to specials and so much more.